EIHA says its CBD research will satisfy EU food safety agency’s requirements

Source: HempToday.net | Author: Hemp Today | June 22, 2022

EIHA projects GmbH, a consortium of the European Industrial Hemp Association (EIHA), said research it is currently conducting on the safety of CBD will meet the expectations of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

Concern about safety on the part of EFSA “is definitely not a surprise and 100% in line with our approach,” EIHA said in a statement.

EFSA earlier this month said it had identified gaps in research regarding the effects of CBD on humans, declaring “the safety of CBD as a novel (new) food cannot currently be established.”

The EIHA consortium is spending €2.5 to €3 million on extensive toxicology and clinical research regarding CBD and THC which will be the basis for its novel food applications, which cover isolates and full-spectrum formulations.

Pooling resources

“We decided in 2021 to pool the resources of more than 100 companies and work . . . on a serious and solid submission, anticipating the scientific gaps indicated by EFSA,” EIHA said.

While EFSA has not concluded that CBD consumption is dangerous, the agency said in a statement issued earlier this month that research currently available on the compound’s effects on the liver, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine system, nervous system, and on psychological well-being is insufficient.

The EFSA statement was a response to the European Commission, which sought input from the agency’s experts regarding the safety of CBD. The Commission has said CBD can be classified as a new or “novel” food if it meets relevant provisions in EU food legislation.

Cutting costs

EIHA formed the consortium as a way to reduce the cost of the EU’s novel food approval procedure to its members. The Association estimates the cost of getting a single product approved under novel food rules as ranging from €350,000 to €500,000 per product.

Participation in the EIHA consortium, structured in two categories, significantly reduces those costs. In the first category, producers of hemp biomass and raw materials, makers of processed extracts, premixes, oils, and isolates as well as service providers pay fees according to an eight-tier payment structure which ranges from €20,000 for those with CBD-related income of €1 million or less, up to €330,000 for those with income of €50 million or more. Consortium participants are also required to join the EIHA on a parallel rate scale that ranges from €2,500 to €25,000.

Under a companion 12-tier sublicensing program for white-label operators, fees range from €1,800 for companies with income of €10,000 or less up to €405,000 for those with income of €50 million or more.

Novel food in the EU

Europe’s novel food rules were created to control new, genetically or synthetically produced food products before market entry. Under the guidelines, novel foods are defined as those that were not consumed to a significant degree in the EU before May 15, 1997. If a food is considered novel it must undergo a pre-market safety assessment under EFSA before it can be legally marketed in the EU.

ChemSafe, an Italian consultancy that has experience in the chemical, pharmaceutical, biocides, agrochemical, cosmetics, medical devices and food sectors, is heading the science-based analysis of CBD and THC on behalf of EIHA.

EFSA has scheduled an information session June 28, during which agency representatives will answer questions and provide guidance to current novel food applicants regarding the research gaps identified. A total of 19 CBD applications are now before the agency.

Study: History of Marijuana Use Not Associated with Increased Heart Attack Risk

Source: Norml.org | Author: Norml | Feb 17, 2022

New York, NY: Cannabis smoke exposure is not positively associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, according to data published in the journal Cureus

A pair of researchers with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City assessed the association between a history of cannabis smoking and heart attack in a cohort of over 500,000 subjects from the United Kingdom.

Researchers identified an inverse association between cannabis use and incidences of myocardial infarction, and they found no correlation between marijuana consumption and heart attack severity. 

“With marijuana use, MI [myocardial infarction] decreased,” authors concluded. They further acknowledged: “The association of marijuana use with reduced risk of MI is not entirely in accord with current assumptions about the cardiac effects of marijuana. … Further studies are warranted.”

Studies assessing the association between cannabis use and cardiovascular health have been inconsistent, with some studies finding an increased risk of stroke and other cardiovascular diseases among marijuana consumers while others report either no risk or provide evidence of possible cardioprotection

Full text of the study, “Marijuana and myocardial infarction in the UK Biobank cohort,” appears in Cureus.

Apple Secretly Joined Amazon In Advancing Commercial Cannabis Reform

Source: Forbes.com | Author: Robert Hoban | Feb 15, 2022

This past summer, a little recognized thing occurred — one of the largest and most respected companies in the world quietly changed its policies in favor of cannabis. That company was Apple. As a result, they joined the ranks of Amazon as a global corporation advocating for policy reform that would open a federally legal, commercial cannabis industry in the United States.

For years, large tech companies, including Facebook and Google, have refused to acknowledge the legality of industrial hemp, let alone the legality of medical or recreational marijuana. Finally, Apple bucked that trend. In June, the fine print of Apple’s “App Store Review Guidelines” release stated that apps handling sales and delivery of medical and recreational cannabis in legal jurisdictions are now allowed on the App Store. This was monumental.  

Unlike the big headlines we’ve seen recently from Amazon, Uber, the NFL, and other mainstream, institutional businesses, showing a positively changing attitude toward cannabis, Apple made no big-splash announcement that this had happened. Yet, this change came at a time of a shift in the cannabis paradigm for voters, policymakers, and the average American. 

As we’ve discussed previously, U.S. voters are shifting rapidly and dramatically in favor of cannabis legalization. The most recent Gallup poll showed that 68% of American voters support some form of legalization. There’s also tremendous momentum from the recent unveiling of the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).

The financial technology experts at ArtisIQ are ahead of the curve in identifying the imperative to collaborate with tech leaders like Apple to update policy to reflect the mainstream adoption of cannabis. Co-Founder and CMO of Artis, Adair Lion shares, “As a fintech company on the cutting-edge of development in both cannabis and retail, Apple’s Policy changes are a monumental shift in the way our society does mobile transactions.”

When political leaders and Fortune 100 companies begin modifying policies and behavior to accommodate something that has been seen as fringe, elicit, or otherwise illegal, the hearts and minds of American start to change. It’s safe to say the tide is turning. 

This is the kind of influence that sets the tone for mainstream behavior. Think back to the early days of Babe Ruth and baseball, where ball players were smoking cigarettes in the dugout and cigarette advertisements abounded. Or more recently, Elon Musk and Tesla’s support of cryptocurrency which influenced much wider adoption and made the price of Bitcoin soar. 

The fine print of Apple’s policy update states that apps involved in the sale of cannabis are exclusive to licensed legal entities and strictly require geo-fencing within the legal jurisdiction. This requires an enormous amount of technological and regulatory compliance and is precisely where a fintech software company like Artis could excel. Consumer behavior shows the need for embedded digital payment technology. There’s been modest growth in payment and technology solutions for the cannabis industry and ancillary service providers. This is in no small part due to federal illegality and the fragmented nature of the industry.   

Apple’s policy adjustments are just an example of the level of innovation and attention to detail that Artis is providing to the cannabis industry. What is it that propels some tech companies above the rest? It’s those that provide solutions for the world’s most complex problems. It’s plain to see that cannabis has presented enormous complexity to politicians, enterprise businesses, and just about every other imaginable cog in the machine of our modern world.  

The contributions of experienced professionals are unequivocally what is necessary to propel cannabis further into the mainstream. These are the building blocks, the intimate details, that ultimately bring to reality the hopes of grand legislation, like the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act. Compliant and lawful participation in the cannabis ecosystem is paramount to widespread, mainstream adoption. As one who has had to navigate the grey areas of cannabis law for many years – and I’m as honest as a Denver man can be – I will always applaud the hard work to deliberately pave the way forward for this industry.

Another bill to raise U.S. THC limit to 1.0% introduced in Congress

Source: HempToday.com | Author: HempToday | Feb 8, 2022

A new bill introduced in the U.S. Congress would raise the limit for THC in hemp from 0.3% to 1.0% and adjust other provisions in current law to ease the path to market for producers.

The Hemp Advancement Act of 2022, introduced by Rep. Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat, addresses issues arising from the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized industrial hemp federally.

In addition to raising the THC limit for crops in the field, provisions in the bill aimed at protecting consumers would set the combined limit for delta-9 and other forms of THC in hemp products at 0.3%.

Raising the limit to 1.0% THC in the field would protect farmers from their crops going hot, and protect producers from hemp going over that limit during the production process, which now makes them technically illegal.

Other key provisions

Other proposed provisions would provide additional protections for the processing and transportation of “hot” hemp, end a Drug Enforcement Agency monopoly on registering testing laboratories, and repeal a controversial ban on drug felons obtaining hemp licenses. 

Under current rules in the Farm Bill, hemp growers and processors often struggle to navigate THC testing and transportation requirements. Meanwhile, consumers are often confused by products that are marketed as hemp but which are more appropriately sold in recreational marijuana sales channels.

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has twice introduced a separate measure, the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan Act, which also includes a proposal to raise the THC limit to 1.0%. The U.S. National Association of State Departments of Agriculture has supported the change.

Czech change on THC limit sets an example for other EU states

Source: HempToday.net | Author: Hemp Today | Sept 27, 2021

Amendments to Czech law that would raise the national THC limit for industrial hemp to 1.0% could spark other EU countries to revisit their current limits. But the change is not likely to affect farmers, who can’t qualify for subsidies if their hemp crops are over the EU limit of 0.2%, and food and cosmetics rules still must be changed to establish a legal pathway to market for those products.

Czech President Miloš Zeman is expected to sign the bill after the Parliament’s Chamber of Deputies sent it to his desk earlier this month.

Changing the amount of THC allowable in hemp plants to 1.0% would put the Czech limit well beyond that of the EU, even after the European Parliament voted last October to increase the authorized THC level for industrial hemp “on the field” from 0.2% to 0.3%.

Farm subsidies critical

In addition to direct cash offsets, many European farmers growing hemp have depended on direct subsidies or EU Rural Development Programme funds as security for agricultural loans and deferred payments. To be eligible for those funds, farmers’ crops may not go beyond the EU’s 0.2% THC limit despite local laws which may be different.

But the Czech law pushing the THC level beyond the EU limit could nonetheless serve as a beacon to other member states, stakeholders say.

“It’s definitely an interesting signal to other EU countries, and maybe it can eventually help to bring the European THC level to 1.0% in the long run,” said Boris Baňas, Chief Sales Officer at Czech-based CBDepot, who estimated that process could take “more than a year or two.”

While the EU-wide change to 0.3% THC is not expected to be in effect until 2023, member states are now in the process of adjusting their national laws to align with the updated limit after the change was included in the most recent round of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reforms.

Trend to 1.0% THC

Many nations around the world are establishing 1.0% THC as their national limits, breaking with the generally accepted global guidance of 0.3% that has been observed since hemp re-emerged in the 1990s.

“Many countries are at 1% already, including Switzerland and Australia,” said veteran American cannabis consultant Richard Rose, who has suggested that certification of hemp varieties should imply legal THC levels. “Not testing THC for approved varieties is what I’ve been advocating for years, since government certification should count for SOMEthing,” Rose said.

The higher limit is important especially for CBD producers; higher THC means higher levels of CBD, as the two compounds rise in proportion. For farmers, it means much less risk of their crops going “hot,” or over the allowable THC level.

“EIHA welcomes this modern approach to THC limits, which is in line with the global development of commercial hemp cultivation,” European Industrial Hemp Association President Daniel Kruse said of the new Czech law.

Decriminalizing extracts

Aside from resetting the THC limit for hemp “on the field,” the new law would mean possession of hemp extracts and tinctures with less than 1% THC won’t be considered a criminal act. “But it doesn’t mean you can infuse any food or cosmetics as such,” Baňas said. Those rules must still be changed to create a legal market.

In a report to Czech Senators outlining the new law, CzecHemp, a stakeholder cluster, said the package of amendments “opens the possibility to manufacture and market products up to a maximum of 1.0% of tetrahydrocannabinol,” but notes that provisions in the new law are “without prejudice to other regulations,” and that products “must be safe and non-misuse.”

While the new law won’t lead to immediate marketability of food and cosmetics, it would decriminalize hemp-based health aids or “cosmetics” often home-made by Czech seniors, according to CzecHemp.

Little effect on processing

While the THC limit change could lead to more latitude and less bureaucracy for extractors, Baňas is skeptical about that. “THC often goes over 1% in hemp processing,” he said. “That means those companies will still need to have authorization for handling that material.”

Under the updated medical cannabis provisions in the new law, multiple licensed private groups could be authorized to manufacture medical cannabis products. Proponents say the changes would expand the availability and diversity of products through competition certain to drive down prices to patients.

In other interpretations from CzecHemp, the new law also:

  • Introduces the term “technical hemp,” (industrial hemp) defined as a plant which comes from seeds listed in the European Catalog or from which hemp with a content of up to 1% THC can be produced.
  • Removes a requirement that processors of “technical cannabis” have authorization to handle addictive substances.
  • Establishes the term “hemp extract for medical use” defined as “intended for the preparation of an individually prepared medicinal product.” CzecHemp said the State Institute for Drug Control must still amend existing legislation to set conditions for “prescribing, preparation, distribution, dispensing and use of individually prepared medicinal products containing cannabis for therapeutic use.”

House Officially Passes Defense Bill With Marijuana Banking Protections, But Key Senators May Block Path Ahead

Source: Marijuana Moment.net | Author: Kyle Jaeger | Sept 23, 2021

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday approved a large-scale defense spending bill that includes an amendment to shield banks that works with state-legal marijuana businesses from being penalized by federal regulators. Now advocates and industry stakeholders are left wondering: what’s the fate of the reform in the Senate? And can it make it to the president’s desk?

New comments from Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)—who’s helping lead the charge to advance comprehensive marijuana legalization and who has been severely critical of efforts to enact banking reform first—signal that the path to pass the incremental policy change through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) could be in jeopardy in the Senate. Other key senators have also expressed skepticism about the reform’s prospects through this process.

For supporters, things may have been more simple if the Senate had moved to include cannabis banking reform in its own version, but the text of NDAA released by Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday does not contain that language. That means the matter will need to be settled in a bicameral conference committee after the full Senate formally passes its bill. At that point, negotiators from both chambers will work to resolve differences between their separate proposals.

Already, there’s pushback from key senators to including the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act in the NDAA that’s ultimately sent to President Joe Biden. That’s not especially surprising considering that leadership, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), has insisted on passing comprehensive justice-focused marijuana legalization first rather than advance an incremental reform on banking. But recent statements do raise questions about the prospects of enacting the reform through the defense bill.

It’s not that the SAFE Banking Act is partisan or especially controversial on its face; it’s a matter of legislative priorities for certain senators and a question of germaneness in NDAA. As of Tuesday, when the reform amendment was officially attached to the House version of the bill, it has now passed five times in the chamber, usually along largely bipartisan lines.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), chief sponsor of the SAFE Banking Act, spoke with Marijuana Moment about the process moving forward in a phone interview on Wednesday. He was optimistic about the measure’s prospects with NDAA as the vehicle, though he conceded that he hadn’t spoken with Schumer or other key senators who are actively finalizing legalization legislation that they hope to see move first.

“I think the fifth time is the charm,” he said. “I mean, obviously, we still have to do some work to make sure that it remains part of the NDAA as the House and the Senate go to conference. So we still have work to do with the Senate to make sure that it remains part of it. But I think that it will.”

“I mean, the fact that it deals with cartels and national security, on top of the need for the public safety piece of this thing, I think that we’ll be able to convince the conference committee and the conferees generally to keep it in,” he said. “But we still have work to do.”

Florida ag commissioner backs marijuana legalization to clear way for hemp

Source: HempToday.net | Author: Hemp Today | Sept 2, 2021

A lack of clarity in federal cannabis laws is suppressing growth of the legal hemp industry, according to Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, who this week wrote a letter to U.S. Senate leaders backing cannabis reform legislation that would end the prohibition on marijuana.

In the letter, addressed to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY), Senator Ron Wyden (OR), and Senator Cory Booker (NJ), the bill’s sponsors, Fried also emphasized the need for the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to classify hemp as a food ingredient.

Fried said the current arbitrary line defining when a product is deemed hemp and legal versus marijuana and illegal often means hemp farmers have problems with access to capital, federal research funding, insurance protections, disaster relief, federal trade promotion programs, and employment protections.

Conflicts

“While the burgeoning growth of the hemp industry is promising, it has also revealed the need for federal action to resolve the conflicts arising from the federal prohibition of marijuana,” Fried wrote in the letter, dated Aug. 31.

Fried’s recommendations address the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, legislation proposed by the three senators which would end the federal marijuana ban while allowing states to determine their own cannabis laws.

“If left unresolved, these unnecessary hurdles could suppress the growth of the hemp industry that is projected to increase at 32 percent annually through 2027 as our nation moves toward more environmental and health-conscious products,” the commissioner wrote.

Federal inaction also means state-legal marijuana industries are stifled, Fried warned.

Focus on food

FDA classification of hemp as a food ingredient would also qualify its derivatives for inclusion in supplements, according to the Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (FDACS). If hemp, on the other hand, is first recognized as a supplement, it may not then cross over and be used as a food ingredient (despite the fact that supplement manufacturing standards are more stringent than those for making food).

Florida’s current legal and regulatory structures are “built on the understanding that hemp is a food additive,” FDACS noted in analysis Fried included with her letter to the senators.

Progress, challenges

Florida has approved more than 800 hemp cultivation permits for farmers in 65 of the state’s 67 counties since FDACS began accepting applications to grow industrial hemp early in 2020. Roughly 22,000 of 30,000 acres approved for planting were farmed last year, according to FDACS figures, representing at least a theoretical economic impact of roughly $300 million, with $136 million in revenue and more than 8,000 jobs created.

But researchers studying hemp’s potential in Florida say they haven’t yet found many hemp varieties viable in the state’s tropical and subtropical climates – a challenge faced by agronomy experts from Latin America to Africa to Southeast Asia, where countries are rushing to roll out hemp initiatives. Regions at tropical latitudes have struggled to find varieties that will flourish and still meet rules governing maximum amounts of THC.

Costs of prohibition

Florida’s hemp plan has been approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, but the state opted to remain under rules in the 2014 Farm Bill hemp pilot program for one more year after the USDA offered that option at the end of 2020. Hemp states without federally approved plans got the one-year extension to give regulators more time to harmonize local and federal laws.

Fried said marijuana legalization would also help resolve conflicts between federal and state laws governing medical and adult-use cannabis. The Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act would expunge federal non-violent marijuana crimes, and reinvest federal cannabis tax revenue into communities historically afflicted by the “War on Drugs.”

“Continued marijuana criminalization demands billions in social, economic, and criminal justice costs, while forgoing billions in potential tax revenue,” Fried wrote in her letter to the Senators.

Court sides with Brazilian patient over import of CBD product

Source: HempToday.net | Author: HempToday | June 22, 2021

A Brazilian medical CBD patient has received a reward of R$10,000 (~$2,000) for distress suffered when the government refused to import a specific CBD product upon request.

The unnamed patient received the favorable judgment on appeal after a lower court had refused his request to import CBD from NuLeaf, a U.S. based producer of hemp-derived cannabinoid products.

While an original civil filing won a judgment that health insurance cooperative Unimed indemnify the patient after refusing to import the CBD product, a second court dismissed the request before it was reinstated in a final ruling.

Health risks

The patient claims he has generalized anxiety and needs the NuLeaf product, which was recommended to him by a medical doctor. He claimed psychological distress and cited risks to his health in seeking redress in the case.

In its original dismissal of the request, the lower court said even though CBD-based medicines are importable with special authorization from the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), NuLeaf is not specifically authorized by the agency.

But the magistrate in the final appeals case said a government resolution on the import and use of CBD-based medicines de facto means products that meet certain criteria are eligible for import into Brazil.

Clinical Study Reports No Evidence of Liver Toxicity in CBD

Source: Hemp Supporter | Author: Hemp Supporter | Mar 24, 2021

We’re excited to announce the results of an important clinical study conducted by ValidCare on CBD: Preliminary results reveal no evidence of liver toxicity.

Since passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, the FDA has been investigating a pathway to regulate the sale of ingestible hemp-derived CBD products. Unfortunately, the agency has not taken any concrete steps, claiming that it needs more real-world data on CBD’s safety profile.

As part of the hemp industry’s continuing effort to provide FDA data, ValidCare commissioned a study and concluded that “preliminary findings show no evidence of liver disease in the 839 participants and no increase in the prevalence of elevated liver function tests when compared to a population with a similar incidence of medical conditions.”

Major kudos to ValidCare, as well as to the US Hemp Roundtable members who funded and participated in the study: American Shaman, CBD Distillery, Charlotte’s Web, Hemp Fusion, Kannaway and Medterra.

Evidence like this confirms that it is high time for FDA to legally recognize and regulate ingestible hemp-derived CBD products. That’s why it’s so important that Congress pass HR 841, which would establish a legal pathway for the sale of hemp-derived extracts as dietary supplements.

Please use our online portal to email your U.S. Representative today, urging him or her to co-sponsor HR 841.

Congress introduces bill to legalize hemp CBD supplements

H.R. 841 would make hemp and all its cannabinoids (except THC) subject to all the other FDA regulations as for any other dietary supplement.

Source: Natural Product Insider | Author: Todd Runestad | Feb 07, 2021

Impatient with foot-dragging by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Congress has re-introduced legislation to compel the regulatory agency to approve CBD—as well as all the other cannabinoids and terpenes within hemp (sans THC)—for use in dietary supplements.

The bill, H.R. 841, is called the Hemp and Hemp-Derived CBD Consumer Protection and Market Stabilization Act of 2021. It is identical to H.R. 8179, introduced in the last Congress.

Introduced by Oregon Democrat Kurt Schrader and Virginia Republican Morgan Griffith, with five Republican and 12 Democratic co-sponsors, the bill would simply make hemp subject to all the other regulations as for any other dietary supplement, subject to new dietary ingredient (NDI) filings, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and labeling and marketing provisions.

It would maintain hemp’s definition as a cannabis plant with less than 0.3% THC—the euphoria-inducing cannabinoid in the plant, which is solely responsible for the difference between hemp and marijuana.

The NDI aspect is a heavy lift, one that could be counted on to radically shrink the number of brands on the market. But the certainty would be a boon for companies that have the wherewithal to produce quality hemp or spend a high six figures to conduct toxicology testing. For growers who have done the tox work, the riches could be legion.

“It provides the category and all of us that play in that field a legitimate entry point into the mainstream marketplaces that have kept us at bay for years now,” said Josh Hendrix, chief growth officer at Driftless Extracts and Workman’s Relief. “This is a step in the right direction for sure. It’s certainly not the final piece of the puzzle but a very important first step for those that are making quality products.

That sentiment is echoed by a longtime supplements trade group, the Council for Responsible Nutrition, which represents large supplements companies that offer guardrails and boundaries circumscribing the “responsible” supplements space.

Julia Gustafson, vice president of government relations for CRN, expressed frustration with the FDA, and hopes that this bill would shift the agency’s thinking around hemp and hemp CBD.

“Due to continued FDA inaction,” said Gustafson, “more consumers are at risk every day of unsafe or illegal products that are poorly manufactured, incorrectly labeled, or illegally deliver THC or other adulterants. Concurrently, responsible CBD companies that adhere to federal regulations and product and market safe and beneficial CBD dietary supplements are forced to share the shelf with disreputable companies that compromise public safety for profit.”

Will the bill compel the FDA to act?

Concern remains for the bill’s fate, as some members of Congress are seen as preferring to let the FDA take the lead. However, impatience with the FDA’s position has directly led to this Congressional action.

“Reps. Schrader and Griffith have shown true leadership on this issue, and we anticipate support continuing to build as it progresses through Congress,” said Jonathan Miller, General Counsel for the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, and spokesperson for a coalition of 19 groups representing hemp and supplements concerns. “The organizations working collectively to establish a trusted marketplace for ingestible hemp-derived ingredients applaud the bipartisan approach on this legislation.”

The coalition, in a press release, lamented the “regulatory uncertainty” that remains about the inclusion of hemp and hemp-derived CBD into ingestible products.

CBD commerce and investment, asserted the coalition, “have resultingly been chilled, impairing job creation and economic opportunity for farmers and small businesses.”

Michael McGuffin, president of the American Herbal Products Association and a coalition partner, provided clarity around the intense desire in the industry for Congress to step in now. He has long maintained that hemp and hemp CBD should simply be treated as any other botanical supplement on the market.

“There remains an absence of substantive progress on FDA’s reported attention to creating a lawful pathway for CBD, and a similar lack of clarification from the agency that simple hemp products, such as tinctures and extracts, should be regulated the same as other herbal supplements,” said McGuffin. “This legislation will fill those gaps, and we see it as important for ensuring that consumers will be able to find hemp and CBD products that are clearly subject to FDA’s enforcement of the robust regulations that apply to all other herbal supplements.”

CRN’s Gustafson hopes this bill will jump-start the FDA’s efforts, focusing its attention on the goal of expanding consumer access to hemp CBD and other cannabinoids and terpenes.

“We call on FDA to constructively engage with the bill sponsors and other stakeholders to address any reservations it may have and to help craft legislation that protects public health while fostering a new category of supplements.”

The U.S. Hemp Roundtable has built a portal where interested parties can contact their Congressional representatives and encourage them to co-sponsor and otherwise support the bill’s passage.

The coalition of 18 groups supporting this bill includes the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), Alliance for Natural Health, Citizens for United Health, Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA), Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), Hemp Alliance of Tennessee, Hemp Industries Association (HIA), Midwest Hemp Council, National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA), National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), National Grocers Association, Texas Hemp Coalition, United Natural Products Alliance (UNPA), U.S. Hemp Authority, U.S. Hemp Building Association, Wisconsin Hemp Alliance, and We Are For Better Alternatives (WAFBA).